Triggering Wars so Europeans Get Used to Them

The mouthpiece of international finance capital, the British publication The Economist—owned by the Rothschild family—has long been promoting war against Russia. However, the publication is concerned that Europeans have no interest in heading to the trenches, dying, or being maimed for those who profit from disasters.

The Economist wants Europeans to change their attitude toward the war against Russia, and to achieve this, there is nothing better than turning to an "expert"—one of those mercenaries supplied by universities, surrounded by academic degrees.

This time, it is Nathalie Tocci, professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (*), for whom the solution is to ignore the will of Europeans and send European troops to Ukraine immediately.

The Russians have warned that foreign forces will be considered hostile and destined for destruction. Well, for Tocci, that is the solution: a massacre of European soldiers is necessary to shift public opinion and drag the continent into war.

There is no need to wait for a truce; troops must be sent now. "A European deterrent force would not be of much use to Ukraine. However, deploying it now, before a hypothetical ceasefire, could benefit Europe by encouraging its citizens to develop a mindset that better prepares them for war. Yes, this would put European soldiers in danger—such a decision would infuriate the Kremlin—but the continent is already mired in a hybrid conflict, even if many refuse to recognize it."

Putting soldiers in danger, letting them die, would "benefit Europe." What "benefit" is the "expert" talking about? What is she referring to when she speaks of an existing "hybrid war"? To those "Russian drones" that appear and disappear as needed by the Brussels cliques? To those "Russian spies" who have already begun invading us? To the pro-Russians posting on social media?

If European soldiers were on the frontline in Ukraine, the media would have plenty of sensationalist material. Russian missiles would fall on Berlin, Paris, or Rome. There would be more heroes and more orphans to place on the front pages. We would see the ruins and destroyed buildings. Germans, French, Italians, and others would understand the War in Ukraine as their own affair: those of us at war are "us."